CHURCH
The term church (Anglo-Saxon, cirice, circe; Modern German, Kirche; Swedish, Kyrka) is the name employed in the Teutonic languages to render the Greek ekklesia (ecclesia), the term by which the New Testament writers denote the society founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ. The derivation of the word has been much debated. It is now agreed that it is derived from the Greek kyriakon (cyriacon), i.e. the Lord's house, a term which from the third century was used, as well as ekklesia, to signify a Christian place of worship. This, though the less usual expression, had apparently obtained currency among the Teutonic races. The Northern tribes had been accustomed to pillage the Christian churches of the empire, long before their own conversion. Hence, even prior to the arrival of the Saxons in Britain, their language had acquired words to designate some of the externals of the Christian religion.
The present
article is arranged as follows:
The term
Ecclesia
The Church
in prophecy
Its
constitution by Christ; the Church after the Ascension
Its
organization by the Apostles
The Church,
a divine society
The Church,
the necessary means of salvation
Visibility
of the Church
The
principle of authority; infallibility; jurisdiction
Members of
the Church
Indefectibility
of the Church; continuity
Universality
of the Church; the "Branch" Theory
Notes of the
Church
The Church,
a perfect society
The term
ecclesia
In order to
understand the precise force of this word, something must first be said as to
its employment by the Septuagint translators of the Old Testament. Although in
one or two places (Psalm 25:5; Judith 6:21; etc.) the word is used without
religious signification, merely in the sense of "an assembly", this
is not usually the case. Ordinarily it is employed as the Greek equivalent of
the Hebrew qahal, i.e., the entire community of the children of Israel viewed
in their religious aspect. Two Hebrew words are employed in the Old Testament
to signify the congregation of Israel, viz. qahal 'êdah. In the Septuagint
these are rendered, respectively, ekklesia and synagoge. Thus in Proverbs 5:14,
where the words occur together, "in the midst of the church and the
congregation", the Greek rendering is en meso ekklesias kai synagoges. The
distinction is indeed not rigidly observed — thus in Exodus, Leviticus and
Numbers, both words are regularly represented by synagoge — but it is adhered
to in the great majority of cases, and may be regarded as an established rule.
In the writings of the New Testament the words are sharply distinguished. With
them ecclesia denotes the Church of Christ; synagoga, the Jews still adhering
to the worship of the Old Covenant. Occasionally, it is true, ecclesia is
employed in its general significance of "assembly" (Acts 19:32; 1
Corinthians 14:19); and synagoga occurs once in reference to a gathering of
Christians, though apparently of a non-religious character (James 2:2) But
ecclesia is never used by the Apostles to denote the Jewish Church. The word as
a technical expression had been transferred to the community of Christian
believers.
It has been
frequently disputed whether there is any difference in the signification of the
two words. St. Augustine (Enarration on Psalm 77) distinguishes them on the
ground that ecclesia is indicative of the calling together of men, synagoga of
the forcible herding together of irrational creatures: "congregatio magis
pecorum convocatio magis hominum intelligi solet". But it may be doubted
whether there is any foundation for this view. It would appear, however, that
the term qahal, was used with the special meaning of "those called by God
to eternal life", while 'êdah, denoted merely "the actually existing
Jewish community" (Schürer, Hist. Jewish People, II, 59). Though the
evidence for this distinction is drawn from the Mishna, and thus belongs to a
somewhat later date, yet the difference in meaning probably existed at the time
of Christ's ministry. But however this may have been, His intention in
employing the term, hitherto used of the Hebrew people viewed as a church, to denote
the society He Himself was establishing cannot be mistaken. It implied the
claim that this society now constituted the true people of God, that the Old
Covenant was passing away, and that He, the promised Messias, was inaugurating
a New Covenant with a New Israel.
As
signifying the Church, the word Ecclesia is used by Christian writers,
sometimes in a wider, sometimes in a more restricted sense.
It is
employed to denote all who, from the beginning of the world, have believed in
the one true God, and have been made His children by grace. In this sense, it
is sometimes distinguished, signifying the Church before the Old Covenant, the
Church of the Old Covenant, or the Church of the New Covenant. Thus St. Gregory
(Book V, Epistle 18) writes: "Sancti ante legem, sancti sub lege, sancti
sub gratiâ, omnes hi . . . in membris Ecclesiæ sunt constituti" (The
saints before the Law, the saints under the Law, and the saints under grace —
all these are constituted members of the Church).
It may
signify the whole body of the faithful, including not merely the members of the
Church who are alive on earth but those, too, whether in heaven or in
purgatory, who form part of the one communion of saints. Considered thus, the
Church is divided into the Church Militant, the Church Suffering, and the
Church Triumphant.
It is
further employed to signify the Church Militant of the New Testament. Even in
this restricted acceptation, there is some variety in the use of the term. The
disciples of a single locality are often referred to in the New Testament as a
Church (Revelation 2:18; Romans 16:4; Acts 9:31), and St. Paul even applies the
term to disciples belonging to a single household (Romans 16:5; 1 Corinthians
16:19, Colossians 4:15; Philemon 1-2). Moreover, it may designate specially
those who exercise the office of teaching and ruling the faithful, the Ecclesia
Docens (Matthew 18:17), or again the governed as distinguished from their
pastors, the Ecclesia Discens (Acts 20:28). In all these cases the name
belonging to the whole is applied to a part. The term, in its full meaning,
denotes the whole body of the faithful, both rulers and ruled, throughout the
world (Ephesians 1:22; Colossians 1:18). It is in this meaning that the Church
is treated of in the present article. As thus understood, the definition of the
Church given by Bellarmine is that usually adopted by Catholic theologians:
"A body of men united together by the profession of the same Christian
Faith, and by participation in the same sacraments, under the governance of
lawful pastors, more especially of the Roman Pontiff, the sole vicar of Christ
on earth" (Coetus hominum ejusdem christianæ fidei professione, et
eorumdem sacramentorum communione colligatus, sub regimine legitimorum pastorum
et præcipue unius Christi in Terris vicarii Romani Pontificis. — Bellarmine, De
Eccl., III, ii, 9). The accuracy of this definition will appear in the course
of the article.
The Church
in prophecy
Hebrew
prophecy relates in almost equal proportions to the person and to the work of
the Messias. This work was conceived as consisting of the establishment of a
kingdom, in which he was to reign over a regenerated Israel. The prophetic
writings describe for us with precision many of the characteristics which were
to distinguish that kingdom. Christ during His ministry affirmed not only that
the prophecies relating to the Messias were fulfilled in His own person, but
also that the expected Messianic kingdom was none other than His Church. A
consideration of the features of the kingdom as depicted by the Prophets, must
therefore greatly assist us in understanding Christ's intentions in the
institution of the Church. Indeed many of the expressions employed by Him in
relation to the society He was establishing are only intelligible in the Light
of these prophecies and of the consequent expectations of the Jewish people. It
will moreover appear that we have a weighty argument for the supernatural
character of the Christian revelation in the precise fulfillment of the sacred
oracles.
A
characteristic feature of the Messianic kingdom, as predicted, is its universal
extent. Not merely the twelve tribes, but the Gentiles are to yield allegiance
to the Son of David. All kings are to serve and obey him; his dominion is to
extend to the ends of the earth (Psalm 21:28 sq.; 2:7-12; 116:1; Zechariah
9:10). Another series of remarkable passages declares that the subject nations
will possess the unity conferred by a common faith and a common worship — a
feature represented under the striking image of the concourse of all peoples
and nations to worship at Jerusalem. "It shall come to pass in the last
days (i.e. in the Messianic Era] . . . that many nations shall say: Come and let
us go up to the mountain of the Lord, and to the house of the God of Jacob; and
he will teach us of his ways and we will walk in his paths; for the law shall
go forth out of Sion, and the word of the Lord out of Jerusalem" (Micah
4:1-2; cf. Isaiah 2:2; Zechariah 8:3). This unity of worship is to be the fruit
of a Divine revelation common to all the inhabitants of the earth (Zechariah
14:8).
Corresponding
to the triple office of the Messias as priest, prophet, and king, it will be
noted that in relation to the kingdom the Sacred Writings lay stress on three
points:
it is to be
endowed with a new and peculiar sacrificial system
it is to be
the kingdom of truth possessed of a Divine revelation
it is to be
governed by an authority emanating from the Messias.
In regard to
the first of these points, the priesthood of the Messias Himself is explicitly
stated (Psalm 109:4); while it is further taught that the worship which He is
to inaugurate shall supersede the sacrifices of the Old Dispensation. This is
implied, as the Apostle tells us, in the very title, "a priest after the
order of Melchisedech"; and the same truth is contained in the prediction
that a new priesthood is to be formed, drawn from other peoples besides the
Israelites (Isaiah 66:18), and in the words of the Prophet Malachias which
foretell the institution of a new sacrifice to be offered "from the rising
of the sun even to the going down" (Malachi 1:11). The sacrifices offered
by the priesthood of the Messianic kingdom are to endure as long as day and
night shall last (Jeremiah 33:20).
The
revelation of the Divine truth under the New Dispensation attested by Jeremias:
"Behold the days shall come saith the Lord, and I will make a new covenant
with the house of Israel and with the house of Juda . . . and they shall teach
no more every man his neighbour, saying: Know the Lord: for all shall know me
from the least of them even to the greatest" (Jeremiah 31:31, 34), while
Zacharias assures us that in those days Jerusalem shall be known as the city of
truth. (Zechariah 8:3).
The passages
which foretell that the Kingdom will possess a peculiar principle of authority
in the personal rule of the Messias are numerous (e.g. Psalms 2 and 71; Isaiah
9:6 sq.); but in relation to Christ's own words, it is of interest to observe
that in some of these passages the prediction is expressed under the metaphor
of a shepherd guiding and governing his flock (Ezekiel 34:23; 37:24-28). It is
noteworthy, moreover, that just as the prophecies in regard to the priestly
office foretell the appointment of a priesthood subordinate to the Messias, so
those which relate to the office of government indicate that the Messias will
associate with Himself other "shepherds", and will exercise His
authority over the nations through rulers delegated to govern in His name
(Jeremiah 18:6; Psalm 44:17; cf. St. Augustine, Enarration on Psalm 44, no.
32). Another feature of the kingdom is to be the sanctity of its members. The
way to it is to be called "the holy way: the unclean shall not pass over
it". The uncircumcised and unclean are not to enter into the renewed
Jerusalem (Isaiah 35:8; 52:1).
The later
uninspired apocalyptic literature of the Jews shows us how profoundly these
predictions had influenced their national hopes, and explains for us the
intense expectation among the populace described in the Gospel narratives. In
these works as in the inspired prophecies the traits of the Messianic kingdom
present two very different aspects. On the one hand, the Messias is a Davidic
king who gathers together the dispersed of Israel, and establishes on this
earth a kingdom of purity and sinlessness (Psalms of Solomon, xvii). The
foreign foe is to be subdued (Assumpt. Moses, c. x) and the wicked are to be
judged in the valley of the son of Hinnon (Enoch, xxv, xxvii, xc). On the other
hand, the kingdom is described in eschatological characters. The Messias is
pre-existent and Divine (Enoch, Simil., xlviii, 3); the kingdom He establishes
is to be a heavenly kingdom inaugurated by a great world-catastrophe, which
separates this world (aion outos), from the world to come (mellon). This
catastrophe is to be accompanied by a judgment both of angels and of men
(Jubilees, x, 8; v, 10; Assumpt. Moses, x, 1). The dead will rise (Psalms of
Solomon, 3.11) and all the members of the Messianic kingdom will become like to
the Messias (Enoch, Simil., xc, 37). This twofold aspect of the Jewish hopes in
regard to the coming Messias must be borne in mind, if Christ's use of the
expression "Kingdom of God" is to be understood. Not infrequently, it
is true, He employs it in an eschatological sense. But far more commonly He
uses it of the kingdom set up on this earth — of His Church. These are indeed,
not two kingdoms, but one. The Kingdom of God to be established at the last day
is the Church in her final triumph.
Constitution
by Christ
The Baptist
proclaimed the near approach of the Kingdom of God, and of the Messianic Era.
He bade all who would share its blessings prepare themselves by penance. His
own mission, he said, was to prepare the way of the Messias. To his disciples
he indicated Jesus of Nazareth as the Messias whose advent he had declared
(John 1:29-31). From the very commencement of His ministry Christ laid claim in
an explicit way to the Messianic dignity. In the synagogue at Nazareth (Luke
4:21) He asserts that the prophecies are fulfilled in His person; He declares
that He is greater than Solomon (Luke 11:31), more venerable than the Temple
(Matthew 12:6), Lord of the Sabbath (Luke 6:5). John, He says, is Elias, the
promised forerunner (Matthew 17:12); and to John's messengers He vouchsafes the
proofs of His Messianic dignity which they request (Luke 7:22). He demands
implicit faith on the ground of His Divine legation (John 6:29). His public
entry into Jerusalem was the acceptance by the whole people of a claim again
and again reiterated before them. The theme of His preaching throughout is the
Kingdom of God which He has come to establish. St. Mark, describing the
beginning of His ministry, says that He came into Galilee saying, "The
time is accomplished, and the Kingdom of God is at hand". For the kingdom
which He was even then establishing in their midst, the Law and the Prophets
had been, He said, but a preparation (Luke 16:16; cf. Matthew 4:23; 9:35;
13:17; 21:43; 24:14; Mark 1:14; Luke 4:43; 8:1; 9:2, 60; 18:17).
When it is
asked what is this kingdom of which Christ spoke, there can be but one answer.
It is His Church, the society of those who accept His Divine legation, and
admit His right to the obedience of faith which He claimed. His whole activity
is directed to the establishment of such a society: He organizes it and
appoints rulers over it, establishes rites and ceremonies in it, transfers to
it the name which had hitherto designated the Jewish Church, and solemnly warns
the Jews that the kingdom was no longer theirs, but had been taken from them
and given to another people. The several steps taken by Christ in organizing
the Church are traced by the Evangelists. He is represented as gathering
numerous disciples, but as selecting twelve from their number to be His
companions in an especial manner. These share His life. To them He reveals the
more hidden parts of His doctrine (Matthew 13:11). He sends them as His
deputies to preach the kingdom, and bestows on them the power to work miracles.
All are bound to accept their message; and those who refuse to listen to them
shall meet a fate more terrible than that of Sodom and Gomorrha (Matthew
10:1-15). The Sacred Writers speak of these twelve chosen disciples in a manner
indicating that they are regarded as forming a corporate body. In several
passages they are still termed "the twelve" even when the number,
understood literally, would be inexact. The name is applied to them when they
have been reduced to eleven by the defection of Judas, on an occasion when only
ten of them were present, and again after the appointment of St. Paul has
increased their number to thirteen (Luke 24:33; John 20:24; 1 Corinthians 15:5;
Revelation 21:14).
In this
constitution of the Apostolate Christ lays the foundation of His Church. But it
is not till the action of official Judaism had rendered it manifestly
impossible to hope the Jewish Church would admit His claim, that He prescribes
for the Church as a body independent of the synagogue and possessed of an
administration of her own. After the breach had become definite, He calls the
Apostles together and speaks to them of the judicial action of the Church,
distinguishing, in an unmistakable manner, between the private individual who
undertakes the work of fraternal correction, and the ecclesiastical authority
empowered to pronounce a judicial sentence (Matthew 18:15-17). To the
jurisdiction thus conferred He attached a Divine sanction. A sentence thus
pronounced, He assured the Apostles, should be ratified in heaven. A further
step was the appointment of St. Peter to be the chief of the Twelve. For this
position he had already been designated (Matthew 16:15 sqq.) on an occasion
previous to that just mentioned: at Cæsarea Philippi, Christ had declared him
to be the rock on which He would build His Church, thus affirming that the
continuance and increase of the Church would rest on the office created in the
person of Peter. To him, moreover, were to be given the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven
— an expression signifying the gift of plenary authority (Isaiah 22:22). The
promise thus made was fulfilled after the Resurrection, on the occasion
narrated in John 21. Here Christ employs a simile used on more than one
occasion by Himself to denote His own relation to the members of His Church —
that of the shepherd and his flock. His solemn charge, "Feed my
sheep", constituted Peter the common shepherd of the whole collective
flock. (For a further consideration of the Petrine texts see article PRIMACY.)
To the twelve Christ committed the charge of spreading the kingdom among all
nations, appointing the rite of baptism as the one means of admission to a
participation in its privileges (Matthew 28:19).
In the
course of this article detailed consideration will be given to the principal
characteristics of the Church. Christ's teaching on this point may be briefly
summarized here. It is to be a kingdom ruled in His absence by men (Matthew
18:18; John 21:17). It is therefore a visible theocracy; and it will be
substituted for the Jewish theocracy that has rejected Him (Matthew 21:43). In
it, until the day of judgment, the bad will be mingled with the good (Matthew
13:41). Its extent will be universal (Matthew 28:19), and its duration to the
end of time (Matthew 13:49); all powers that oppose it shall be crushed
(Matthew 21:44). Moreover, it will be a supernatural kingdom of truth, in the
world, though not of it (John 18:36). It will be one and undivided, and this
unity shall be a witness to all men that its founder came from God (John
17:21).
It is to be
noticed that certain recent critics contest the positions maintained in the
preceding paragraphs. They deny alike that Christ claimed to be the Messias,
and that the kingdom of which He spoke was His Church. Thus, as regards
Christ's claim to Messianic dignity, they say that Christ does not declare
Himself to be the Messias in His preaching: that He bids the possessed who
proclaimed Him the Son of God be silent: that the people did not suspect His
Messiahship, but formed various extravagant hypotheses as to his personality.
It is manifestly impossible within the limits of this article to enter on a
detailed discussion of these points. But, in the light of the testimony of the
passages above cited, it will be seen that the position is entirely untenable.
In reference to the Kingdom of God, many of the critics hold that the current
Jewish conception was wholly eschatological, and that Christ's references to it
must one and all be thus interpreted. This view renders inexplicable the
numerous passages in which Christ speaks of the kingdom as present, and further
involves a misconception as to the nature of Jewish expectations, which, as has
been seen, together with eschatological traits, contained others of a different
character. Harnack (What is Christianity? p. 62) holds that in its inner
meaning the kingdom as conceived by Christ is "a purely religious
blessing, the inner link of the soul with the living God". Such an
interpretation can in no possible way be reconciled with Christ's utterances on
the subject. The whole tenor of his expressions is to lay stress on the concept
of a theocratic society.
No comments: